NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 776 MHz
- 7973.1x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 37.2 GTexel / s
- 12.4x more pipelines: 3584 vs 288
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 10x more maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 776 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 37.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 288 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 102 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 102 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3828 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38889 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 443 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2006 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1914 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | TU102 | GF114 |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 568 | 565 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 776 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 288 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 102 Watt |
Transistor count | 18600 million | 1,950 million |
Floating-point performance | 894.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 210 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 91.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 3828 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |