NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA P104-100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and NVIDIA P104-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1069.6x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 12 December 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P104-100
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51497 vs 38889
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 vs 38889 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA P104-100
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA P104-100 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38889 | 51497 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 123 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3707 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA P104-100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU102 | GP104 |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 12 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 556 | 557 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Transistor count | 18600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 320.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |