NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 924 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 3571.8x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 83.04 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 6 GB
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38889 vs 19018
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 7 October 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 924 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 83.04 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38889 vs 19018 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 81 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38889 | 19018 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5724 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | TU102 | GM204 |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 7 October 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 557 | 558 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | |
Price now | $1,899 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 924 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 83.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 81 Watt |
Transistor count | 18600 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 120 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |