NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
Around 4% better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB

Launch date	18 May 2016 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1306 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate	52.24 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,672 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 5200 MHz
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 190
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 2068

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	6500 MHz vs 5200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	460 vs 190
PassMark - G3D Mark	3032 vs 2068

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

190

460

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2068

3032

Name	NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q	AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark	190	460
PassMark - G3D Mark	2068	3032
Geekbench - OpenCL		14269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		63.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		171.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3340

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q	AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Code name	GM107	Tobago
Launch date	18 May 2016	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	659	662
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1306 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	1000 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,672 gflops	1,613 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	768
Texture fill rate	52.24 GTexel / s	50.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	85 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	2,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	165 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB / s	104.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	6500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5