NVIDIA GRID M40 vs NVIDIA GeForce 810M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M40 and NVIDIA GeForce 810M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 3x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 vs 4.403
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 576.664 vs 131.239
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 24 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 vs 4.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 576.664 vs 131.239 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M40
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 810M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 | 4.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 576.664 | 131.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.529 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.629 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 405 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 69 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1644 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3035 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3035 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 810M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GF117 |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 24 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1431 | 1433 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 738 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3 |