NVIDIA GRID M40 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M40 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 6.8x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 800 MHz
Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 28 April 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 930 MHz
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M40
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Name | NVIDIA GRID M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 576.664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.529 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.629 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 323 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 90 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2160 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla |
Code name | GM107 | G92 |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 28 April 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1418 | 1430 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 264 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 800 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 384 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |