NVIDIA GeForce 305M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 305M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 305M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 81
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 29 July 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 81 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- 5.7x more texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 36.8 gflops
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 151
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 36.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 vs 151 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 305M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 305M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 151 | 381 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1987 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3237 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 305M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G92 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1326 | 1329 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 36.8 gflops | 240 gflops |
Gigaflops | 55 | 360 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |