NVIDIA GeForce 405M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 405M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 405M
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1212 MHz vs 672 MHz
Core clock speed | 1212 MHz vs 672 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 5.9 billion / sec vs 4.85 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 129.02 gflops vs 38.78 gflops
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 14 Watt
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion / sec vs 4.85 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops vs 38.78 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 14 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 405M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 74 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.92 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 405M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT218 | GF108 |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1564 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1212 MHz | 672 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | 48 |
Floating-point performance | 38.78 gflops | 129.02 gflops |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s | 5.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
DirectCompute | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |