NVIDIA GeForce 800A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800A and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 800A

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800A

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
3.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 51 Watt

Launch date	17 March 2014 vs 1 March 2013
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 51 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Around 29% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 738 MHz
5.2x more texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
5.2x better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1577 vs 477
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 165

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	954 MHz vs 738 MHz
Texture fill rate	30.53 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 48
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1577 vs 477
PassMark - G2D Mark	410 vs 165

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

477

1577

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

165

410

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 800A	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark	477	1577
PassMark - G2D Mark	165	410
Geekbench - OpenCL		3883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3339

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 800A	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GF119	GK107
Launch date	17 March 2014	1 March 2013
Place in performance rating	963	965
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$599
Price now		$464
Value for money (0-100)		4.14
Technical info
Core clock speed	738 MHz	954 MHz
Floating-point performance	141.7 gflops	732.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	384
Texture fill rate	5.904 GTexel / s	30.53 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	51 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		202 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5