NVIDIA GeForce 805A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 805A and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 805A
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 68 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 68 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- 4.8x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 805A | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3572 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 805A | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK208 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 787 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
| Price now | $343.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 68 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |