NVIDIA GeForce 830M vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 830M and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 5.4x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 6.4x more pipelines: 256 vs 40
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1009 vs 738
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4232 vs 4035
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 1019
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1668
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 1019
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 27 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 40 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1009 vs 738 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4232 vs 4035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1668 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 136
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 136 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 830M | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1009 | 738 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 | 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4232 | 4035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 156.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.81 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1729 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1729 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1668 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 830M | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | GM108 | Haswell GT3 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 27 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1203 | 1205 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 830M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
IntelIris Graphics 5100
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920A
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
IntelHD Graphics P530
