NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840A and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 5.76 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 7.5x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1123 vs 200
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3117 vs 1844
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3117 vs 1844
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 5 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 5.76 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 115.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1123 vs 200 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 vs 1844 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 vs 1844 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 270 vs 221
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 vs 221 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 840A | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1123 | 200 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 270 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2314 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2314 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 | 1844 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 | 1844 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 840A | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM108 | M92 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 5 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 987 | 990 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 720 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 115.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 5.76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 242 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 |