NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840A and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 980 MHz
  • Around 15% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
  • Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5596 vs 4935
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 March 2014 vs 25 June 2013
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 980 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5596 vs 4935

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

  • Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 2002 MHz
  • Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1688 vs 1123
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 221
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2188
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2188
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 2314
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 2314
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3117
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3117
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 31.36 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5400 MHz vs 2002 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1688 vs 1123
PassMark - G2D Mark 326 vs 221
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3093 vs 2188
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3093 vs 2188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3504 vs 2314
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3504 vs 2314
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344 vs 3117
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344 vs 3117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1123
1688
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
221
326
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5596
4935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2188
3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2188
3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2314
3504
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2314
3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3117
3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3117
3344
Name NVIDIA GeForce 840A NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1123 1688
PassMark - G2D Mark 221 326
Geekbench - OpenCL 5596 4935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2188 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2188 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2314 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2314 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3117 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3117 3344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 28.025
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2148

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 840A NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM108 GK107
Launch date 17 March 2014 25 June 2013
Place in performance rating 987 988
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 980 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 752.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s 31.36 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 16.02 GB / s 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2002 MHz 5400 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus