NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840A and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5596 vs 4935
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 25 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 752.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5596 vs 4935 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1688 vs 1123
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 221
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2188
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2188
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 2314
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 2314
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3117
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3117
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1688 vs 1123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 vs 221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 vs 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 vs 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 3117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 840A | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1123 | 1688 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5596 | 4935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2188 | 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2188 | 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2314 | 3504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2314 | 3504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 | 3344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 840A | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK107 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 25 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 987 | 988 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 31.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |