NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 41.6 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 128 vs 32
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 416.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1640 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 568 vs 131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2007 vs 1 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 41.6 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 416.0 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1640 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 vs 131 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 135 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 109 vs 77
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 135 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 109 vs 77 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 | 131 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | 109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G84 |
Launch date | 11 December 2007 | 1 June 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $149.90 |
Place in performance rating | 1308 | 1309 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $149.90 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 416.0 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 41.6 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 135 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 52.5 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1640 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |