NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra vs ATI Radeon X800 XL
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra and ATI Radeon X800 XL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 612 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 39.2 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 110 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 9.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 643 vs 69
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 May 2007 vs 1 December 2004 |
Core clock speed | 612 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.2 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 643 vs 69 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 XL
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 171 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 252
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 171 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 271 vs 252 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 XL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | ATI Radeon X800 XL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 643 | 69 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 252 | 271 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | ATI Radeon X800 XL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | R400 |
Code name | G80 | R430 |
Launch date | 2 May 2007 | 1 December 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $829 | |
Place in performance rating | 615 | 619 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 612 MHz | 400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 612 | |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.2 billion / sec | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 171 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 681 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 270 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 103.7 GB / s | 31.36 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1080 MHz | 980 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
SLI |