NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 612 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 39.2 billion / sec vs 12 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 643 vs 270
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 May 2007 vs 18 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 612 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.2 billion / sec vs 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 643 vs 270 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 171 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 264 vs 252
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 171 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 264 vs 252 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 643 | 270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 252 | 264 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G80 | G71 |
Launch date | 2 May 2007 | 18 April 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $829 | |
Place in performance rating | 617 | 620 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 612 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 612 | |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 39.2 billion / sec | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 171 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 681 million | 278 million |
Boost clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 270 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 103.7 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 600 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
SLI |