NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS vs ATI Radeon X1600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS and ATI Radeon X1600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 6.3x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 2.54 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 7.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 382 vs 49
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1989 vs 1019
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1989 vs 1019
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 November 2007 vs 1 January 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 2.54 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 vs 49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1989 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1989 vs 1019 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 635 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 159
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 635 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 159 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | ATI Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 | 49 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 | 209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1989 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1989 | 1019 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | ATI Radeon X1600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | R500 |
| Code name | G92 | RV516 |
| Launch date | 1 November 2007 | 1 January 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1276 | 1277 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 635 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 160 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 2.54 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 27 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
