NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX and NVIDIA GeForce 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 4.6x more texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 462 vs 113
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2485 vs 484
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2485 vs 484
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2007 vs 14 April 2004 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 462 vs 113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2485 vs 484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2485 vs 484 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 6800
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 258 vs 175
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 258 vs 175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 462 | 113 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2485 | 484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2485 | 484 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G92 | NV40 A1 |
Launch date | 1 November 2007 | 14 April 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1152 | 1154 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 325 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
SLI |