AMD Radeon HD 7730M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7730M and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7730M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 96
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 763 vs 462
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 213 vs 175
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2485
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2485
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 April 2012 vs 1 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 763 vs 462 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 vs 175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 2485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 2485 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7730M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7730M | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 763 | 462 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 175 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.244 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.172 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.524 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.319 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.757 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1777 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3220 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 2485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1777 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3220 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 2485 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7730M | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Chelsea | G92 |
Launch date | 24 April 2012 | 1 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1149 | 1152 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 675 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
SLI |