NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 4.7x more boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 210 MHz
- 28.2x more texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 256 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 486 MHz
- 36x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1081 vs 30
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 1 June 2004 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 210 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 486 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1081 vs 30 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 166 vs 150
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 166 vs 150 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1081 | 30 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 166 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3937 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Rage 9 |
Code name | GM108 | M12 |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 1 June 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1039 | 1037 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 210 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | |
Transistor count | 76 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 3.89 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 183 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 486 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | 64 |
Shared memory | 0 | no |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |