NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon R5 M335
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and AMD Radeon R5 M335 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
- Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1081 vs 549
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1080
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1114
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1716
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1080
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1114
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 21 October 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1081 vs 549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1716 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 965 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 256
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 684.8 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 150
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4690 vs 3937
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 965 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops vs 602.1 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 150 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4690 vs 3937 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M335
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1081 | 549 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 577 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3937 | 4690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1716 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Exo |
| Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 21 October 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1039 | 1040 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1070 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 1070 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 684.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 21.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 920MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9550
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs
ATIRadeon X800 GTO AGP
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
