NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon R5 M335

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and AMD Radeon R5 M335 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
  • Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1081 vs 549
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1080
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1114
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1716
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1080
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1114
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1716
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 March 2016 vs 21 October 2015
Texture fill rate 28.22 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1081 vs 549
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1764 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3691 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1764 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3691 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 1716

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335

  • Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 965 MHz
  • Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 993 MHz
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 256
  • Around 14% better floating-point performance: 684.8 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 150
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4651 vs 3928
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1070 MHz vs 965 MHz
Boost clock speed 1070 MHz vs 993 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 256
Floating-point performance 684.8 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 577 vs 150
Geekbench - OpenCL 4651 vs 3928

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M335

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1081
549
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
150
577
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3928
4651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1764
1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3691
1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1764
1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3691
1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
1716
Name NVIDIA GeForce 920MX AMD Radeon R5 M335
PassMark - G3D Mark 1081 549
PassMark - G2D Mark 150 577
Geekbench - OpenCL 3928 4651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1764 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3691 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1764 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3691 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 1716
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 120.354

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX AMD Radeon R5 M335

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell GCN 1.0
Code name GM108 Exo
Launch date 25 March 2016 21 October 2015
Place in performance rating 1039 1040
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz 1070 MHz
Core clock speed 965 MHz 1070 MHz
Floating-point performance 602.1 gflops 684.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 256 320
Texture fill rate 28.22 GTexel / s 21.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 16 Watt
Compute units 5
Transistor count 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1100 MHz
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore