NVIDIA GeForce 940A vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940A and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3615 vs 1586
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3615 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2418
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2418
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3615 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3615 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 2418 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1626 vs 1107
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 214
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 vs 1107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940A | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1107 | 1626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3615 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3615 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5848 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 940A | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 730 | 732 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |