NVIDIA GeForce 940A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1019 MHz
- 9.1x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3615 vs 1849
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3615 vs 1849
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 1673
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 1673
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 3 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1019 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3615 vs 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3615 vs 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 1673 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- 13x more texture fill rate: 234 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 384
- 7.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,130 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 1 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 1107
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 214
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 vs 1107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1107 | 5590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3615 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3615 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 1673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16270 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 940A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK104 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 3 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 723 | 735 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1019 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 915 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2x 3,130 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2x 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 234 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 300 Watt |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 384 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |