NVIDIA GeForce 940M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 3x better floating-point performance: 903.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1127 vs 438
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 154 vs 119
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5982 vs 2422
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 vs 1019
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 2843
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3329
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 vs 1019
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 2843
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 9 January 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 vs 438 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 vs 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 vs 2422 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 vs 2843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 vs 2843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 438 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 | 2422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 2843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 2843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GF117 |
| Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 9 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1184 | 1172 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 940M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDFirePro W2100
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M430
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM
