NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 38% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1072 MHz versus 775 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 28.22 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1127 versus 438
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 154 versus 119
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5982 versus 2422
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1019
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 versus 2843
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3329
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1019
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 versus 2843
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3329
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 9 January 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 versus 438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 versus 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 versus 2422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 versus 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 versus 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 | 2422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GM108 | GF117 |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 9 January 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1184 | 1172 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |