NVIDIA GeForce 940M vs AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940M and AMD Radeon R6 M255DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1127 vs 605
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 154 vs 116
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 vs 1055
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 1927
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 vs 1055
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 1927
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 7 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 vs 605 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 vs 116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 vs 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 vs 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 vs 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 vs 1927 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17123 vs 5982
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3563 vs 3357
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3563 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 576 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 vs 5982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 605 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 116 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 | 17123 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3563 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3563 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 940M | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Jet |
| Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 7 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1184 | 1186 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 576 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||