NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 vs 716
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 172 vs 119
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6325 vs 3722
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 vs 8.358
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.94 vs 157.606
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 vs 0.843
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 vs 15.374
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 vs 40.443
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 1598
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 1598
• Around 79% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 585 vs 326

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 3587
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 3587

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1516 716
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	172 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6325 3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.91 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.94 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.83 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.833 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	103.937 40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	585 326

Compare specifications (specs)