NVIDIA GeForce 940MX versus NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce 920M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 92% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 23.83 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 versus 716
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 172 versus 119
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6325 versus 3722
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 versus 8.358
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.94 versus 157.606
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 versus 0.843
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 versus 15.374
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 versus 40.443
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 versus 1598
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 versus 1598
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 585 versus 326
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 versus 716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 versus 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 versus 3722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 versus 8.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 versus 157.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 versus 0.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 versus 15.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 versus 40.443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 versus 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 versus 1598 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 versus 326 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 versus 3587
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 versus 3587
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 versus 3587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 versus 3587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 3722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 8.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 157.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 0.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 15.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 40.443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 | 326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GK208B |
| Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1071 | 1297 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940MX avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2500M
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 A330
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
AMDRadeon R6 M340DX
