NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT and NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 8.8 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 150 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 / 512 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 650 MHz
- 28.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 172 vs 6
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 15 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 / 512 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 172 vs 6 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 190 vs 32
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 vs 32 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 172 | 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 | 190 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Kelvin |
Code name | G96C | NV28 A1 |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 15 March 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1666 | 962 |
Price now | $85.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 300 MHz |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 89.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 150 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 314 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 6.875" (17.5 cm) | 216 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 / 512 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI |