NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT and NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 32 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 172 vs 68
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 512
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 512
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 3 June 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Pipelines | 32 vs 8 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 172 vs 68 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 vs 512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 vs 512 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 47 vs 32
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 47 vs 32 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 172 | 68 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 | 47 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 | 512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 | 512 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | |
| Code name | G96C | MCP77MH MCP79MH |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 3 June 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1666 | 1667 |
| Price now | $85.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 89.6 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 32 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 314 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 6.875" (17.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 / 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT with others
NVIDIAGeForce 9500 GT vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 290
NVIDIAGeForce 9500 GT vs
NVIDIAION 2
NVIDIAGeForce 9500 GT vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9100M G
NVIDIAGeForce 9500 GT vs
NVIDIAGeForce G105M
NVIDIAGeForce 9500 GT vs
NVIDIAGeForce G210M
NVIDIAGeForce 9500 GT vs
NVIDIAGeForce G103M
