NVIDIA GeForce G105M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G105M and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G105M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 50 Watt
Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 29 July 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 billion / sec vs 5.12 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 32 vs 8
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 89.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 166 vs 63
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 32 vs 23
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 1314
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 1314
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec vs 5.12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 89.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 166 vs 63 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 vs 23 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 vs 1314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 vs 1314 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G105M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G105M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 63 | 166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 23 | 32 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2534 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1314 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1314 | 1505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G105M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G96C |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1665 | 1667 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
Price now | $85.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 8 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
Gigaflops | 38 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 5.12 GTexel / s | 8.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 314 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | VGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 6.875" (17.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 8 (DDR2) / 11 (GDDR3) | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 / 512 MB | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
SLI |