NVIDIA GeForce G105M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G105M and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G105M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 50 Watt
Launch date 8 January 2009 vs 29 July 2008
Core clock speed 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 14 Watt vs 50 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

  • Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 billion / sec vs 5.12 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 32 vs 8
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 89.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 166 vs 63
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 32 vs 23
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 1314
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 1314
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 8.8 billion / sec vs 5.12 GTexel / s
Pipelines 32 vs 8
Floating-point performance 89.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm vs 65 nm
Memory clock speed 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 166 vs 63
PassMark - G2D Mark 32 vs 23
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1505 vs 1314
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1505 vs 1314

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G105M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
63
166
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
23
32
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1314
1505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1314
1505
Name NVIDIA GeForce G105M NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 63 166
PassMark - G2D Mark 23 32
Geekbench - OpenCL 2534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1314 1505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1314 1505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 56.838

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce G105M NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G98 G96C
Launch date 8 January 2009 29 July 2008
Place in performance rating 1665 1667
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $85.99
Price now $85.99
Value for money (0-100) 4.13

Technical info

Core clock speed 1600 MHz 1400 MHz
CUDA cores 8 32
Floating-point performance 25.6 gflops 89.6 gflops
Gigaflops 38
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 8 32
Texture fill rate 5.12 GTexel / s 8.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 14 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 210 million 314 million
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors VGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536 2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 6.875" (17.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 2.1 2.1

Memory

Memory bandwidth 8 (DDR2) / 11 (GDDR3) 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2)
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount 256 / 512 MB

Technologies

CUDA
Power management 8.0
SLI