NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT and NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 4x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 8.8 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 / 512 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 172 vs 114
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 20 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 / 512 MB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 172 vs 114 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
- 11.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 360 vs 32
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 vs 32 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 172 | 114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 | 360 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G96C | G73 |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 20 April 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 1666 | 472 |
Price now | $85.99 | $150.25 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | 0.98 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 350 MHz |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 89.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 177 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 6.875" (17.5 cm) | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 / 512 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI |