NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 576 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 46.4 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 448.0 gflops vs 345.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 155 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 900 MHz
Launch date | 21 July 2008 vs 8 November 2006 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 576 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.4 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 448.0 gflops vs 345.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 155 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 512 MB
Maximum memory size | 768 MB vs 512 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 579 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G80 |
Launch date | 21 July 2008 | 8 November 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | $599 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1291 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 576 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 448.0 gflops | 345.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 46.4 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 155 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 681 million |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 270 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
SLI |