NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 46.4 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 128 vs 112
- Around 60% better floating-point performance: 448.0 gflops vs 280 gflops
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.4 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 448.0 gflops vs 280 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G92 |
Launch date | 21 July 2008 | 15 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | $328.50 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1353 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $328.50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.78 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 448.0 gflops | 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 46.4 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores per GPU | 112 | |
Gigaflops | 420 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |