NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
4.1x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 450 MHz
26.2x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 128 vs 40
13.1x better floating-point performance: 470.0 gflops vs 36 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
10.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 328
10.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 328
5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 vs 90

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	16 January 2009 vs 14 May 2007
Core clock speed	1836 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate	47.2 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	128 vs 40
Floating-point performance	470.0 gflops vs 36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	512 MB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309 vs 328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309 vs 328
PassMark - G3D Mark	507 vs 90

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 88

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	212 vs 88

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

328

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

328

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

212

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

507

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	54.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.56
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	108.412
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309	328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309	328
PassMark - G2D Mark	88	212
PassMark - G3D Mark	507	90

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Essentials
Architecture	Tesla	TeraScale
Code name	G92B	M72
Launch date	16 January 2009	14 May 2007
Launch price (MSRP)	$229
Place in performance rating	1307	1300
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1836 MHz	450 MHz
CUDA cores	128
Floating-point performance	470.0 gflops	36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	65 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C
Pipelines	128	40
Texture fill rate	47.2 billion / sec	1.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	141 Watt
Transistor count	754 million	180 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	S / PDIF
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI	No outputs
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options	2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	10.0	10.0
OpenGL	2.1	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	70.4 GB / s	6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz	800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR3	DDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI
PowerPlay 7.0