NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 2.9x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • 4.7x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 10 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 128 vs 32
  • 5.9x better floating-point performance: 470.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
  • 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 vs 131
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 January 2009 vs 1 June 2007
Core clock speed 1836 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate 47.2 billion / sec vs 10 GTexel / s
Pipelines 128 vs 32
Floating-point performance 470.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm vs 80 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 507 vs 131

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 141 Watt
  • Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 109 vs 88
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 141 Watt
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 109 vs 88

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
88
109
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
507
131
Name NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.56
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 108.412
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309
PassMark - G2D Mark 88 109
PassMark - G3D Mark 507 131

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G92B G84
Launch date 16 January 2009 1 June 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $229 $149.90
Place in performance rating 1307 1309
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Price now $149.90
Value for money (0-100) 1.87

Technical info

Core clock speed 1836 MHz 625 MHz
CUDA cores 128
Floating-point performance 470.0 gflops 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 80 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Pipelines 128 32
Texture fill rate 47.2 billion / sec 10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 141 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 754 million 289 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI No outputs
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-HE
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options 2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 2.1 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 70.4 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
SLI