NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 4.2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 360 MHz
- 26.7x more texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 2.88 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 2x 128 vs 16
- 33.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 384.0 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 7.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 613 vs 84
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3238 vs 628
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3238 vs 628
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 March 2008 vs 12 September 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 360 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 76.8 billion / sec vs 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 128 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 384.0 gflops vs 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 512 MB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 613 vs 84 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3238 vs 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3238 vs 628 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 197 Watt
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 262
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 197 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 262 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 613 | 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 | 385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3238 | 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3238 | 628 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G92 | G84 |
| Launch date | 18 March 2008 | 12 September 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $129 |
| Place in performance rating | 887 | 888 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $92.75 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 360 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 384.0 gflops | 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2x 128 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 76.8 billion / sec | 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 197 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI | 2x DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 198 mm |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 (64 per GPU) | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||

