AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 2.8x more pipelines: 704 vs 2x 128
  • 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
  • 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 197 Watt
  • 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1857 vs 613
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 262
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3238
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3238
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 February 2018 vs 18 March 2008
Pipelines 704 vs 2x 128
Floating-point performance 1,830 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 197 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1857 vs 613
PassMark - G2D Mark 478 vs 262
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 vs 3238
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 vs 3238

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

  • 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 57.2 GTexel / s
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 76.8 billion / sec vs 57.2 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1857
613
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
478
262
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3238
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3238
Name AMD Radeon Vega 11 NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
PassMark - G3D Mark 1857 613
PassMark - G2D Mark 478 262
Geekbench - OpenCL 13318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 371.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 52.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 248.838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 3238
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 3238
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 11 NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Tesla
Code name Owl G92
Launch date 13 February 2018 18 March 2008
Place in performance rating 886 887
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $599

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1500 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,830 gflops 2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 704 2x 128
Texture fill rate 57.2 GTexel / s 76.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 197 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million 754 million
CUDA cores 256 (128 per GPU)
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 6-pin & 8-pin
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options Quad

Memory

Memory type System Shared GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2x 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 128 (64 per GPU)
Memory bus width 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz

API support

DirectX 10.0
OpenGL 2.1

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
SLI