AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.8x more pipelines: 704 vs 2x 128
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 197 Watt
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1857 vs 613
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 262
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3238
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3238
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 18 March 2008 |
Pipelines | 704 vs 2x 128 |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 197 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1857 vs 613 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 vs 262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3238 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
- 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 57.2 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76.8 billion / sec vs 57.2 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1857 | 613 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | 262 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3238 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Owl | G92 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 18 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 886 | 887 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 2x 128 |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 76.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 197 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128 (64 per GPU) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |