NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 vs ATI Radeon X300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 and ATI Radeon X300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 4x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 51.2x more texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 1.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2x 512 MB vs 64 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 15x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 613 vs 41
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 262 vs 209
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 March 2008 vs 1 September 2004 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76.8 billion / sec vs 1.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 512 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 613 vs 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 vs 209 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X300
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 36 Watt vs 197 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 36 Watt vs 197 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | ATI Radeon X300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 613 | 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 | 209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3238 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3238 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | ATI Radeon X300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 9 |
Code name | G92 | RV370 |
Launch date | 18 March 2008 | 1 September 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 887 | 884 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 375 MHz |
CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 384.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 110 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 2x 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 76.8 billion / sec | 1.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 197 Watt | 36 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 512 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 (64 per GPU) | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |