NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 430 MHz
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 16 billion / sec vs 10.32 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
- Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 109 Watt
- Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 534 vs 227
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2414 vs 855
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2414 vs 855
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2008 vs 28 July 2005 |
Core clock speed | 530 MHz vs 430 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16 billion / sec vs 10.32 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 109 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 vs 227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2414 vs 855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2414 vs 855 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 50
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 50 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 | 227 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2414 | 855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2414 | 855 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G94 | G70 |
Launch date | 1 November 2008 | 28 July 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 1479 | 1482 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $249 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.08 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 430 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 169.6 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 254 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 16 billion / sec | 10.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 109 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 302 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 33.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 |