NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 16 billion / sec vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 64 vs 32
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 169.6 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 534 vs 208
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2414 vs 1857
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2414 vs 1857
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2008 vs 9 June 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 16 billion / sec vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 169.6 gflops vs 73.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 vs 208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2414 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2414 vs 1857 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 530 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 84 vs 50
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 530 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 84 vs 50 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 | 208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 84 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2414 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2414 | 1857 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94 | G84 |
Launch date | 1 November 2008 | 9 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1479 | 1481 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 575 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 169.6 gflops | 73.6 gflops |
Gigaflops | 254 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 16 billion / sec | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | no |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |