NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 91.8x more texture fill rate: 23.49 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8354 vs 3638
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8354 vs 3638
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Jan 2021 vs 2 November 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 23.49 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8354 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8354 vs 3638 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 9.5x more pipelines: 2432 vs 256
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 256 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8354 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8354 | 3638 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP108 | GP104 |
Launch date | 13 Jan 2021 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 153 | 250 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 31.32 GFLOPS (1:24) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 751.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.49 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 1800 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |