NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 10.4x more texture fill rate: 20.8 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 64 vs 40
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 208 gflops vs 40 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 658 vs 91
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 March 2009 vs 7 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 208 gflops vs 40 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 658 vs 91 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
- 8.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 105 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 247 vs 225
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 vs 225 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 247 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 658 | 91 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G94B | M82 |
Launch date | 10 March 2009 | 7 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 728 | 729 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 208 gflops | 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Powerplay |