NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 1536 vs 64
- 11.8x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 208 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3808 vs 658
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 vs 225
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 vs 10 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 208 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3808 vs 658 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 vs 225 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 122 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3808 | 658 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12778 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
Code name | GK104 | G94B |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 | 10 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 725 | 728 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 208 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | 20.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |