NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 58 Watt vs 75 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 506 MHz
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 8.1 GTexel / s
- Around 61% better floating-point performance: 156 gflops vs 97.15 gflops
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 506 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 8.1 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 156 gflops vs 97.15 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 323 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 70 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3233 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3233 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6073 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G94B |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 | 12 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1421 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $43.99 | |
Price now | $43.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 506 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 97.15 gflops | 156 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 8.1 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |