NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 990 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2145 vs 1814
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2145 vs 1814
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 990 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2145 vs 1814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2145 vs 1814 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 116.16 gflops vs 95.04 gflops
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 224 vs 170
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 55 vs 49
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6543 vs 5606
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 116.16 gflops vs 95.04 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 224 vs 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 55 vs 49 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6543 vs 5606 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 170 | 224 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | 55 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5606 | 6543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2145 | 1814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2145 | 1814 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT216 | GT216 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1553 | 1554 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 990 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 95.04 gflops | 116.16 gflops |
Gigaflops | 142 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMIVGASingle Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | 25.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
SLI |