NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon X700 XL
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon X700 XL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 6.3x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 660 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 189
- 12.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 738 vs 60
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 vs 1 March 2005 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 vs 189 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 738 vs 60 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X700 XL
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon X700 XL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 189 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 738 | 60 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11231 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon X700 XL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | R400 |
Code name | GT215 | M26 |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 | 1 March 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 958 | 960 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | |
Transistor count | 727 million | 120 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 27.2 GB / s | 10.56 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 660 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |