AMD FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V4900 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
- 3x better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1006 vs 738
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 320 vs 242
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3974
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3974
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 vs 2 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1006 vs 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 vs 242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 vs 3974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 vs 3974 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11231 vs 1927
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11231 vs 1927 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V4900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V4900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1006 | 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 | 242 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1927 | 11231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 392.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.818 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 | 3974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 | 3974 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V4900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Turks | GT215 |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 | 2 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 957 | 958 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 27.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |