NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 130 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 188
- 21.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 738 vs 35
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 vs 12 May 2003 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 vs 188 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 738 vs 35 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 188 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 738 | 35 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11231 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Rankine |
Code name | GT215 | NV35 |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 | 12 May 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 958 | 961 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | |
Transistor count | 727 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 168 mm | 218 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 27.2 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |