NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M vs ATI FirePro V5800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M and ATI FirePro V5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 690 MHz
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 74 Watt
• 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
• 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12379 vs 3099

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V5800

• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 10.6 billion / sec
• 5.6x more pipelines: 800 vs 144
• 3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,104.0 gflops vs 339.8 gflops
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1176 vs 811
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 272 vs 203
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3319 vs 3274
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3319 vs 3274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V5800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	811 1176
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	203 272
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12379 3099
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3319
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3352

Compare specifications (specs)